Janakiraman v. S. Kokila
Case brief
What is this about?
Five civil revision petitions filed under Article 226 against defective decrees in civil suits were dismissed because the petitioner failed to pursue them for three years, indicating lack of interest.
What did the court decide?
All civil revision petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed and closed.
What the court decided
CRP.PD.Nos.162 of 2018, 4755, 4822 & 4826 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.PD.Nos.162 of 2018, 4755, 4822 & 4826 of 2017 and CMP.Nos.939 of 2018, 22377, 22803 & 22821 2017
CRP.PD.No.162 of 2018
Janakiraman ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Kokila
2.Ayyadurai
3.Deenan
4.Manoharan
5.Neelakandan
6.Karunakaran
7.Palani
8.Dhandapani ..Respondents
PRAYER:
The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 06.06.2016 passed in IA.No.760 of 2014 in OS.No.351 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee.
1/6
CRP.PD.Nos.162 of 2018, 4755, 4822 & 4826 of 2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether civil revision petitions filed without pursuit for three years should be dismissed due to lack of interest.
Whether the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee's orders dated 06.06.2016 in connected civil suits require revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Janakiraman
- respondent
S.Kokila
- respondent
Ayyadurai
- respondent
Deenan
- respondent
Manoharan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court