M.Arunachalam@Arun v. Ambika
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner via video conferencing without ordering costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.04.2021
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P.(PD) No.149 of 2019
M.Arunachalam @ Arun
Ambika
.. Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent Vs .. Respondent /Respondent/Petitioner
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 03.01.2019 passed in I.A.No.6591 of 2018 in O.P.No.3014 of 2014 on the file of the V Additional Family Court at Chennai.
For Petitioner .. Mr.G.R.M.Palaniappan
For Respondent .. Mr.T.Sivananthan
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Arunachalam @ Arun
- respondent
Ambika
Coram
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court