The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition on the representation that the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, allowing the withdrawal request.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)No.271 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P(NPD).No.271 of 2019
T.S.R.Samy @ T.S.Rangasamy ...Petitioner
Vs
Ramasamy ...Respondent
Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 30.10.2018 in I.A.No.461 of
2018 in O.S.No.32 of 2017 on the file of the Sub Court, Sathyamangalam.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Chinnaraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Parthasarathy
1/2
C.R.P.(PD)No.271 of 2019
cse
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J,
ORDER
A representation is made by the learned counsel for the petitioner
through video conferencing that he may be permitted to withdraw the Civil
Revision Petition.
2.In view of the said representation, the Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. .
27.04.2021
cse
Index:Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
To
The Sub Judge,
Sathyamangalam.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.271 of 2019
2/2
T.S. Samy @ T.S. Rangasamy
Ramasamy
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
