Dismissed

R.Sathyanarayanan v. v.Ranganathan

Madras HC23 Nov 2021CRP/1264/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 seeking to challenge an interim order. Observing that the underlying suit was dismissed for default and a restoration application was also dismissed for default, the court held the petition premature and dismissed it to await the restoration of the suit, while closing the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed; liberty given to proceed upon restoration of suit; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

R.Sathyanarayanan Vs v.Ranganathan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 23.11.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.7037 of 2016

R.Sathyanarayanan

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.V.Ranganathan

2.R.Sakthivel

3.Jyothi

4.Saradha

5.Senior Regional Manager (Retail Business) Indian Oil Corporation, D.No.234, 1^st floor Kondalampatti, Bangalore Bye-pass Road Salem Taluk, Salem District. .. Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 05.04.2016 made in I.A.No.42 of 2016 in O.S.No.18 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Court, Dharmapuri.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016

¶19

For Petitioner	: Mr.P.Valliappan
For R1	: Mr.R.Selvakumar
For R2	: Ms.S.Sridevi
For RR3 and 5	: No appearance

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(The matter is heard through “Video-conferencing/ Hybrid mode”) Both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the

¶22

respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 05.04.2016 made in I.A.No.42 of 2016 in O.S.No.18 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Court, Dharmapuri. Pending Civil Revision Petition, the suit in O.S.No.18 of 2013 was dismissed for default on 01.08.2016 and I.A. filed to restore the said suit was also dismissed for default.

¶23

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further

¶24

submitted that petitioner has also filed I.A. to restore the I.A. filed to restore the suit, the same is pending and hence, seeks liberty to proceed with the Civil Revision Petition after restoration of the suit.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016

¶28

3.Recording the above submissions, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. It is open to the petitioner to proceed with the Civil Revision Petition once suit is restored. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶29

23.11.2021

¶30

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No kj To

¶31

The Additional District Judge Dharmapuri.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016

¶35

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

¶36

¶37

C.R.P.(PD)No.1264 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.7037 of 2016

¶38

23.11.2021

¶39

4/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Sathyanarayanan v. v.Ranganathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Sathyanarayanan v. v.Ranganathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahale Sunnathwal Jamath Vs Haji Syed Irfan Hussain Sahib (Died)

S.Sathish Kumar Vs K.Kothai Rathnamala

Priya Vs M.S.K.Shanmugam

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs C.Dinesh

The New India Assurance Vs Palani

Unnamalai Vs Velliangiri