S.Sathish Kumar v. K.Kothai Rathnamala
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Petition for default due to the total absence of the petitioner's representation on two hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.14061 of 2016 in C.R.P.(PD).No.870 of 2016
C.M.P.No.14061 of 2016 in C.R.P.(PD).No.870 of 2016
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for default.
22.11.2021
krk
1/1
Petitioner
V.M.Velumani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court