Kavitha v. Sugumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge of the Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 as infructuous, noting nothing remained for adjudication regarding a docket order.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
CRP.No. 1231 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :05.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRP.No. 1231 of 2018
and CMP.No. 6278 of 2018
Kavitha ..Petitioner
Vs
Sugumar .. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order in I.A unnumbered of 2017 in RCOP.No. 1 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif, Pappireddipatti, Dharmapuri dated 19.06.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan, SC
For Mr.M.Muruganantham
For Respondent : No appearance.
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
If so, whether it should be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kavitha
- respondent
Sugumar
Coram
K Kalyanasundaram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court