The Single Judge dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as withdrawn by the petitioner on the representation that the parties had amicable settlement. The connected miscellaneous petition was consecutively closed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
C.R.P.No.660 of 2018
and
CMP No.3406 of 2018
S. Vignesh ...Petitioner / Respondent
Vs
G.N. Gayathiri ...Respondent / Petitioner
Civil Revision Peititon filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order
passed in I.A.No.50/2017 in O.P.No.21/2017 dated 23.11.2017
passed by the Sub Judge, Sathiyamangalam and allow the Civil
Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.S. Parthasarathy
For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner, Mr.S.Parthasarathy, that the dispute between the
parties have been amicably settled and he seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
2. In the light of the submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
mrp
To:
The Sub Judge
Sathiyamangalam, Erode.
C.R.P.No.660 of 2018
and
CMP No.3406 of 2018
SV-I(CO)
SB(27/08/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Vignesh
G.N. Gayathiri
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court