Periyasamy v. R.Sampath
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 because the sole respondent died in 2018 and his legal heirs were not brought on record.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP (PD).No.1184 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 17.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRP (PD).No.1184 of 2018
and CMP.No.6115 of 2018
Periyasamy ...Petitioner
Vs
R.Sampath ..Respondent
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 05.06.2015 made in I.A.No.141 of 2015 in O.S.No.177 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vriddhachalam
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Dhanasekaran
For Respondent : No Appearance
1/ 3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Periyasamy
- respondent
R.Sampath
Coram
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court