The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 as a default order. The court could not obtain fresh service of notice to the respondent due to insufficient instructions from the petitioner.
Revision Petition dismissed for default. No costs connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRP (NPD).No.1874 of 2018 and CMP.No.10699 of 2018
Gulab Jain (died) Eqbal
...Petitioner
Vs
Afsar Begum ..Respondent
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and final orders of the learned Principal District Judge of Dharmapuri, dated 21.03.2018 in I.A.No.16 of 2016 in unnumbered First Appeal of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vigneshwar for Mr.V.Nicholas
For Respondent : No Appearance
ORDER
The private notice sent to the respondent has been returned unserved for the reason "insufficient address".
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To 1. The Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri 2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. +1 cc to M/s.V.Nicholas,Advocate Sr.No. 40681 CRP (NPD).No.1874 of 2018 SJ (CO) CT(06/09/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Eqbal
Afsar Begum
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
