Allowed

L.Jeyanthi v. M.Thatchayeni

Madras HC17 Mar 2021CRL RC(MD)/724/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed a criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against a conviction for cheque dishonour. The Court allowed the appeal following a post-filing settlement via mediation, incorporating the mediation terms into the order.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision case was allowed, and the terms of the mediation report and settlement agreement were made part of this order.

L.Jeyanthi Vs M.Thatchayeni — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.724 of 2020

¶2

Bail Slip

¶3

(Crl.RC(MD)No.724 of 2020)

¶4

Mrs.L.Jeyanthi, W/o.S.Laxmanan, who is the petitioner in Crl.RC (MD)No.724 of 2020 was directed to be released on bail vide order of this Hon'ble Court dated 18.02.2021 made in Crl.MP(MD)No.7748 of 2020 in Crl.RC(MD)No.724 of 2020

¶5

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶6

DATE : 17.03.2021

¶7

CORAM

¶8

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI

¶9

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.724 of 2020

¶10

L.Jeyanthi ... Petitioner/Appellant/Accused

¶11

Vs.

¶12

M.Thatchayeni .. Respondent/Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Prayer : This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment of V Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai in Crl.A.NO.44 of 2018 dated 20.08.2020 confirming judgment of conviction and sentence ordered by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II (Fast Track Court) Madurai in STC No.434 of 2016 dated 26.03.2018 convicted the appellant/accused for offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and imposed the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and directed appellant herein to pay the cheque amount I.e. A sum of Rs.1,95,000/- as compensation to respondent/complainant within the limitation of two months as per Section 357 of Criminal Procedure Code.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jeyaram For Respondent : Mr.S.Poornachandran

¶15

ORDER

¶16

When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is stated by both the learned counsels that during the pendency of this revision case, both parties have settled the dispute amicably through mediation. The mediation report dated 05.03.2021 signed by both the parties and their respective counsels was filed before this Court.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.724 of 2020

¶20

In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of the mediation report dated 05.03.2021 and the terms of agreement in the mediation report shall form part of this order.

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

Encl:Xerox copy of Mediation Report and Settlement Agreement

¶24

Mrn

¶25

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID – 19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶26

¶27

1.The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶28

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.II (Fast Track Court) Madurai.

¶29

+1 CC to Mr.A.JEYARAM, Advocate ( SR-12600[F] dated 19/03/2021 )

¶30

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.724 of 2020 17.03.2021

¶31

KM (25.03.2021) 2P 4C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

L.Jeyanthi v. M.Thatchayeni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Jeyanthi v. M.Thatchayeni

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muneshwaran Vs Sasikala

Alagarsamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Ponraj Vs Pon Sudalai Raj

R.Arumugam Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

A.Saravanan Vs S.Padma Priya

D.Ayyappan Vs S.Lakshmanan