4.On the side of the respondents, it is stated that based on the report of the second respondent, the first respondent has made an enquiry. During the enquiry, the petitioner executed a bond under Section 110 of Cr.P.C., in M.C.No.1140/Ni.Se.Na &Ka.Thu.Aa/Ma.Maa/2020. Subsequently, on 22.08.2020, the petitioner was arrested in Crime No.2138 of 2020 under Section 25(1)(A) of Arms Act and Section 398 of IPC. On the report of the second respondent, the first respondent initiated proceedings under Section 122(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner was given opportunity to cross examine. The petitioner has chosen to cross examine the witness himself. On 01.09.2020, he cross examined two of the witnesses. At the request of the petitioner, the proceedings was adjourned to 04.09.2020. The petitioner cross examined one witness by name Ravi and another witness Chidambaram on 10.09.2020, the petitioner cross examined witness Silambarasan. The petitioner did not cross examine the Sub Inspector Chinnapandi. Convincing on the evidence of P.W.1 to P.W.5, the first respondent after following due procedures, satisfied himself and passed the impugned order and prayed the petition to be dismissed.
