The petitioner counsel withdrew the Criminal Revision seeking discharge allowed. This court dismissed the revision as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
The criminal revision was dismissed as withdrawn and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDRA
Crl.R.C.No.953 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.6633 of 2020
Fredrick Duraisamy ... Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
State Represented by The Inspector of Police, G-3, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai – 600 010.
...Respondent/Complainant
Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order passed by the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, made in M.P.No.2386 of 2017 in C.C.8436/2017 dated 04.02.2020 and discharge the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Lita Srinivasan Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
When the criminal revision is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement in this petition to that effect.
2 Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement, this criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
Sub Assistant Registrar
cgi
To
Crl.R.C.No.953 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.6633 of 2020
PL(CO) GN(17/12/2021)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Fredrick Duraisamy
State Represented by The Inspector of Police, G-3, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai – 600 010
A.D. Jagadish Chandra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
