Dismissed

K.Raghu v. State Rep.by

Madras HC6 Dec 2021CRL RC/280/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a Criminal Revision Petition under CrPC Section 397 to set aside an order. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a quash petition. The court dismissed the revision as withdrawn, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a quash petition if grounds are made out; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

K.Raghu Vs State Rep.by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :06.12.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

CRL.R.C.No.280 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.2033 of 2020

¶6

K.Raghu S/o, Kumarasamy pillai

¶7

R.Ponnusamy S/o, Ramasamy ... Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State represented by, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Namakkal.

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Namakkal in Crl.M.P.No.9072 of 2015 in C.C.No.348 of 2013 dated 31.12.2019 by allowing this Revision.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 31.12.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.9072 of 2015 in C.C.No.348 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent purchasers. The other accused have brought in some persons stated to be their relatives and believing them, the petitioners had kept the documents as collateral security in a Bank and received loan and on coming to know of the offence committed by the other accused, the

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

petitioners have settled their loan and the documents were also returned to the other accused.

¶17

Further, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Petition with liberty to file a quash petition.

¶18

In view of the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a quash petition, if grounds are made out. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS IV)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

mfa

¶24

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate-I, Namakkal.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Namakkal.

¶27

The Public Prosecutor, High Court,

¶28

Madras.

¶29

CRL.R.C.No.280 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.2033 of 2020

¶30

BP(CO) CT 30/12/2021

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Raghu v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Raghu v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadikbasha Vs the State Repby

S.Vadivi Vs the Inspector of Police(Crime)

M.S.Murugeshan Vs State Rep by

Palanivel Vs State Rep by

Sudhakar Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Diraviyam Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police