Petition under Section 397 and 401 CrPC to set aside an order was filed. The Court held the petition infructuous as the underlying criminal case had already been disposed of and dismissed it. Connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.714 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8218 of 2018
K. Subramani
.. Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
V. Sankar
.. Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 03.04.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.1591/2017 in C.C.No.126/2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam.
For Petitioner : Mr. R. Dilli Kumar
For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
revision case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar AT To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam. 2.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.R.Rajarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.39971
Crl.R.C.No.714 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.8218 of 2018
AK(CO) SU(06/09/2021)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Subramani
V. Sankar
RMT Teekaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
