D.Ezhilarasi v. S.Periasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court addressed a revision in a cheque bouncing case. It upheld the conviction but reduced the six-month sentence to three months considering the accused's advanced age.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision matters partly allowed; the sentence of six months reduced to three months.
What the court decided
BAIL SLIP
The Petitioner / Accused viz., D.Ezhilarasi aged 56 years W/o.Sekar was directed to be released on bail vide order in M.P.Nos.1 and 3 of 2015 in Crl.R.C.No.591 of 2015 dated 19.06.2015.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.591 of 2015
D.Ezhilarasi
...Petitioner/Single accused
Vs.
S.Periasamy ...Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Salem, made in Crl.A.No.55 of 2014, dated 31.03.2015, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court in C.C.No.91 of 2013, by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Omalur, Salem District, dated 24.03.2014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused failure to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 was sufficient for conviction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Ezhilarasi
- respondent
S. Periasamy
Coram
RMT. TEAKKA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court