No substantive issues were decided. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the criminal revision case. The court dismissed the case as withdrawn and directed the petitioner to file a memo.
This Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Crl.R.C.No.1013 of 2017
N.Sampath Kumar ... Petitioner/Complainant
Vs.
1.Malarvizhy
2.K.Ramesh
3.Eashwari
4.Pappathi
5.Renuka Devi ... Respondents/Accused 1 to 5
PRAYER: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section
397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., to allow the above Crl.R.C., by
setting aside the order dated 20.04.2017 passed in
Crl.M.P.No.6525 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate
Court No.3, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner: Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For Respondents: No appearance
(The case has been heard through Video Conference)
The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner
appeared through video conference before this Court and seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision
Case.
2.In view of the above submission made by the learned
counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, this Criminal
Revision Case stands dismissed as withdrawn and to that effect,
the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is directed to
file a memo.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
dua
To:
The Judicial Magistrate Court No.3, Coimbatore.
Crl.R.C.No.1013 of 2017
RGN(CO)
B.VC (12/10/2021)
N.Sampath Kumar
Malarvizhy
K.Ramesh
Eashwari
Pappathi
Renuka Devi
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court