The High Court dismissed a Criminal Revision Case as infructuous because the petitioner and respondent were living together in Hyderabad, making the challenge to the lower court judgment no longer viable.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRL.R.C.NO.433 OF 2015
AND
M.P.NO.1 OF 2015
1.C. Jayalakshmi
2.S. Chennai Arasan
3.C. Ganesan
4.S. Anandhi
5.S. Suganthi
.. Petitioners
Vs.
G. Padmasoundari
.. Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the
Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment in D.V.No.5
of 2013, dated 23.06.2014 on the file of XV Metropolitan
Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, confirmed by the learned VI
Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, dated 06.01.2015 in
C.A.No.193 of 2014 and call for the records and acquit the
petitioners from all the charges.
For Petitioners: Mr.Y.Arul Manickam
For Respondent: Mr.V.S.Senthil Kumar
O R D E R
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
both the 3rd petitioner/husband and respondent/wife joined
together and living in Hyderabad.
3. Recording the same, this Criminal Revision Case is
dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
AT
To
1. The XV Metropolitan Magistrate,
George Town, Chennai.
2. The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
3. The VI Additional Sessions Judge,
Chennai.4. The Principal Sessions Judge,
Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.Y.Arul Manickam, Advocate, S.R.No.42763
Crl.R.C.No.433 of 2015 and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
NRL(CO)
RLP(21/09/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Jayalakshmi
S. Chennai Arasan
C. Ganesan
S. Anandhi
S. Suganthi
G. Padmasoundari
RMT. Teekaa Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court