Criminal Revision petition and connectedMagistrate. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners' representatives on the listed date. Consequently, the connected Crl.M.P. was closed.
The Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and the connected Crl.M.P. is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
CRL.R.C.NO.841 OF 2017 AND CRL.M.P.NO.7741 OF 2017
..Vs..
M.Roseline ... Respondent
PRAYER:Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the order in C.A.No.154 of 2015, dated 17.03.2017, passed by the VI Additional Session Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the order in Crl.M.P.No.2587 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015 on the file of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and set aside the same.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter was listed on 10.08.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be listed on 24.08.2021 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today i.e. 24.08.2021, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvi
To
NK(CO) PBS/16/09/2021
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Anthony Amalan
Anthony Royappan
Geetha Rani
M. Roseline
R.M.T. Teekaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
