M/S.Global Agricultural v. M/S. India Agro Export (P) Ltd.

Madras HC20 Oct 2021CRL RC/1346/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against an order appointing a new complainant in a cheque dishonour case, the High Court noted a filed compromise memo where the accused agreed to pay a settlement sum. Finding that the underlying dispute reached a stage of settlement, the Court closed the matter as no further order was necessary and directed parties to appear before the Trial

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed and closed; parties directed to appear before Trial Court on 19.01.2022 to report payment status.

M/S.Global Agricultural Vs M/S. India Agro Export (P) Ltd. — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 20.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.1346 of 2017
and Crl.M.P.No.13075 of 2017

¶6

1.M/s.Global Agricultural Services

¶7

 Agri consultants
 represented by its Proprietor,
 P.Parthiban

¶8

2.P.Parthiban
 Proprietor,
 M/s.Global Agricultural Services,
 Agri consultants... Petitioners/Accused

¶9

Vs.

¶10

M/s.India Agro Export (P) Ltd.,
represented by its Admin. Manager,
K.Rajangam,
No.15, Race Course Road,
Guindy, Chennai 600 032. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

Prayer: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section
397 of Cr.P.C., read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for
the records in Crl.M.P.No.1799 of 2017 in C.C.No2486 of 2016 on
the file of the learned Fast Track Court No.II, Metropolitan
Magistrate Court, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai – 3, dated
11.08.2017 and to set aside the same.

¶12

For Petitioners: Mr.R.Boopathy

¶13

For Respondent: Mr.K.Thangam
 for Mr.Thangarasu

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(The case has been heard through Video Conference)

¶17

This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order
passed in Crl.M.P.No.1799 of 2017, by the learned Fast Track
Court No.II, Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore at Allikulam,
Chennai – 3, dated 11.08.2017.

¶18

2.The respondent herein/complainant has filed a case in
C.C.No.2486 of 2016, before the Fast Track Court No.II,
Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai – 8,
for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act. During the pendency of the above said C.C. a petition was
filed by the respondent herein/complainant in Crl.M.P.No.1799 of
2017, to substitute the new representative viz., K.Rajangam in
the place of earlier representative viz., M.Saravanan, and the
same was allowed. Hence, the present Criminal Revision Case has
been filed by the accused before this Court.

¶19

3.Heard both the learned counsels and perused the
materials placed on record.

¶20

4.During the pending of this Criminal Revision Case
compromise was arrived at by the revision petitioner/accused and
a memo has been filed on behalf of the petitioners/accused to
that effect, wherein revision petitioner/accused agreed to pay a
sum of Rs.4,40,000/- as one time settlement, out of which, a sum
of Rs.3,40,000/- has already been paid and another sum of
Rs.25,000/- has been paid by way of G-pay in the name of the
respondent/complainant and the balance amount of Rs.75,000/- is
to be paid. Further, it is seen from the memo that before the
Trial Court for reporting settlement the matter was posted on
19.01.2022.

¶21

5.Thelearnedcounselfortherespondent
herein/complainant would state that the entire amount has not
been paid and that this revision case is only against the order
passed in Crl.M.P.No.1799 of 2017, for payment of balance
amount.

¶22

6.In view of the subsequent development, this Court finds
that no further order is necessary in this case. Accordingly,
this Criminal Revision Case stands closed. Since the matter

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

posted on 19.01.2022, for arguments or for reporting settlement
before the Trial Court, both the parties are directed to appear
before the Trial Court on that day.

¶25

7.With the above observations and direction, this
Criminal Revision Case stands closed. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

 Sd/-

¶27

 Assistant Registrar

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

 Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

dua

¶31

To:

¶32

1. The Fast Track Court No.II Judge,

¶33

Metropolitan Magistrate Court,

¶34

Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai – 3

¶35

+1cc to Mr.K.Thangarasu, Advocate, S.R.No.54346

¶36

+1cc to Mr.R.Boopathy, Advocate, S.R.No.53734

¶37

Crl.R.C.No.1346 of 2017
and Crl.M.P.No.13075 of 2017

¶38

MG(CO)

¶39

SB(10/11/2021)

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Global Agricultural v. M/S. India Agro Export (P) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Global Agricultural v. M/S. India Agro Export (P) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadevan, S/O.Ayyanar Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by

Krishnakumar Vs Boopalan

Moorthy Vs State Rep. by

Padma, F/45 Vs the Inspector of Police

Sivanathan Vs State by

Balasubramanian Vs State Rep. by