Moorthy v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. Today, when the matter…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.R.C.No.1200 of 2015
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
- Today, when the matter came up
- under the caption 'for being mentioned', the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that at paragraph Nos.17 and 21 of the order dated 08.10.2021, the learned Sessions Judge would come instead of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge. Hence, at paragraphs 3, 4, 17 and 21, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge shall be deleted and the it shall be read as the learned Sessions Judge.
17.11.2021
Note :Registry shall carry out the above correction and issue fresh copy of the order.
vri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order dated 08.10.2021, issued by the Assistant Sessions Judge, should be treated as if issued by the Sessions Judge for specific paragraphs.
Coram
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court