S.Shalini v. G.Ganesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged dismissal of request for handwriting expert opinion under Section 45 Indian Evidence Act to verify cheque signature, arguing mismatch endorsement. Court held admission of blank cheque issuance removed need for expert opinion.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed; trial court directed to dispose complaint within six months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Criminal Revision Case No.1274 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.8950 of 2020
S.Shalini ... Petitioner ..vs.. G.Ganesh ... Respondent
Prayer:Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C, to set aside the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level -IV, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.6825 of 2019 in C.C.No.1342 of 2015 dated 18.03.2020 and consequently permit the petitioner for giving sample signature to the handwriting expert to compare the signature in question on the cheque.
For Petitioner : M/s.Karpagam M for Mr.R.Prabhakaran
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 18.03.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6825 of 2019 in C.C.No.1342 of 2015 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level -IV, Chennai.
- The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1342 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu. Further, the petitioner filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.6825 of 2019 under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level -IV, Chennai seeking to get the opinion of the hand writing expert. After considering the materials, the learned Magistrate dismissed the said petition on ground that the petitioner herself admitted the fact that she has given a blank cheque as security for the debts. Therefore, once the petitioner has admitted the issuance of the cheque, the same need not be sent for expert opinion. Challenging the said order the petitioner is before this Court.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an expert opinion on handwriting is necessary when the accused admits issuing the cheque for security.
Whether the lower magistrate was correct in dismissing the petition for expert opinion based on admission of blank cheque issuance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Shalini
- respondent
G. Ganesh
Coram
P. Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court