Dismissed

Chithra v. State Represented by

Madras HC27 Jul 2021CRL RC/1264/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition as withdrawn. It directed the Special Judge to frame charges within a week and complete the trial within three days. The court ordered cooperation from petitioners and accused to ensure timely disposal.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Criminal Revision Petition allowed with directions for speedy trial under POCSO Act; bail to be cancelled if accused do not cooperate.

Chithra Vs State Represented by — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

CRL.R.C.No.1264 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.17035 & 17036 of 2019

¶6

1.Chithra W/o, Senthil

¶7

2.Senthil S/o, Muthu ...Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Denkanikotta, Krishnagiri District.

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the order dismissing the petition filed under 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Cr.M.P.No.193 of 2019 in Spl.S.C.No.1 of 2019 in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri.

¶12

For Petitioners: Mr.R.John Sathyan

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Government Advocate, (Criminal Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dismissing the petition filed under 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Crl.M.P.No.193 of 2019 in Spl.S.C.No.1 of 2019 in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri.

¶16

The learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Petition.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Since the year of the offence is 2017 and also the

¶19

offences are under POCSO Act, the learned Special Judge is directed to frame the charges within a week and proceed further and complete the trial within three months on day to day basis.

¶20

The petitioners and also all other accused are directed to co-operate for the early disposal of the trial, failing which, if the accused are in bail, the learned Special Judge is directed to cancel the bail and remand back them under prison and proceed further on day today basis and dispose of the matter within three months.

¶21

In view of the above submission, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above directions. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶22

s/d-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶24

True Copy

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

mfa

¶27

¶28

The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri.

¶29

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Denkanikotta, Krishnagiri District.

¶30

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶31

4.The Chairman POCSO Committee High Court, Madras 104.

¶32

CRL.R.C.No.1264 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.Nos.17035 & 17036 of 2019

¶33

RLD(CO) SP(19/08/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chithra v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chithra v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Venkadesan Vs State Rep.by

A.Arunachalam Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Raja Vs State Rep.by

Anandharaj Vs State Rep by

Jayanthakumar Vs the State Rep by

M/S.Jagannath Textile Company Ltd., Vs S.Manoharan