the Doctor made entries in the Accident Register, which was marked as Ex.P.10. Thereafter, the victim girl was produced before the Judicial Magistrate for recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C/Ex.P2, in which, the victim girl has clearly narrated the said incident. Therefore, the evidence of the victim girl is corroborated with the evidence of P.W.4/grand mother of the victim girl, the Doctor/P.W.12 and her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. He would further submit that the Doctor has opined that there was no injury found on the body of the victim girl, in cases of this nature, it depends upon the force and method adopted by the accused. Further, there is no dispute regarding identification of the accused, during trial and statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, in which, the victim girl has clearly deposed that when she was sleeping at her home, at that time the appellant, who is a well known person had committed the said offence and there is no reason to disbelieve the evidence of the victim girl. Therefore, considering the age of the victim girl and the gravity of the offence committed by the appellant, the trial Court rightly appreciated the entire evidence and convicted and sentenced the appellant and hence, there is no merit in this appeal and the same is liable to be dismissed.
