Abizar N. Rangawala, 39 Yrs, v. Mrs. Sakina
Case brief
What is this about?
& 526 of 2015 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., This…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.R.C.Nos.1097 of 2017 & 526 of 2015
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
This matter is posted today under the caption "for being mentioned".
- It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Senior Counsel
for the petitioners that at paragraph No.22 of the order dated 24.11.2021, the amount was mentioned as "Rs.17,000/-" and it should be typed as "Rs.75,000/-".
- In view of the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioners, in paragraph No.22 of the order dated 24.11.2021, the amount of Rs.17,000/- is ordered to be replaced by Rs.75,000/- .
13.12.2021
nvi
Note:-
Registry is directed to issue fresh order copy to the parties, after making necessary corrections.
Coram
TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court