Disposed

Santhanam v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC5 Jul 2021CRL OP(MD)/4733/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought withdrawal of a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC. The Court permitted the withdrawal for the first petitioner only and dismissed all connected petitions without adjudicating the merits or rights of the remaining petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw petition for first petitioner; criminal original petition dismissed as withdrawn for the first petitioner only.

Santhanam Vs The Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4733 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.03.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD)No.4733 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2706 and 2708 of 2020

¶7

1.Santhanam 2.Muniyandi 3.Mookammal

¶8

... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4

¶9

¶10

State rep. by

¶11

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kadambur, Tuticorin District.

¶12

In Crime No.1/2019. ... 1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶13

2.Jeyalakshmi ...2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant 3.Santhanamari ... 3^rd Respondent/victim

¶14

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.85/2019 on the file of the Mahila Court, Tuticorin and quash the same as petitioner's concerned.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Maheswarn For R1 : Mr.A.Robinson Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition as regards the first petitioner Santhanam. He also made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted.

¶18

2.In view of the endorsement so made, the criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn as regards the first petitioner Santhanam. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4733 of 2020

¶21

merits of the matter. All the contentions and defences of the petitioner are left open. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶22

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

rmi

¶26

To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kadambur, Tuticorin District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶27

COPY TO

¶28

The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (2 copies)

¶29

Crl.O.P(MD)No.4733 of 2020 17.03.2020

¶30

VB(19.05.2020) 2P 5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Santhanam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhanam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliammal Vs Petchiammal

Arivazhagan Vs The Inspector of Police

Sundar Vs The Inspector of Police

K.Raju Vs The Inspector of Police

Kannan Vs The Inspector of Police

Ramachandran Vs The Inspector of Police