Kaliammal v. Petchiammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default due to non-payment of court fees and failure of appellant to comply with notices sent over the preceding three years.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.941 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.07.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.941 of 2007
1.Kaliammal
2.S.Gurusamy
... Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs
Vs.
1.Petchiammal
- 2.Thangamalai
3.Thangamalai Nadar ... Respondents 1 to 3 /Respondents 1,2 to 4/ Defendants 1 to 3
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2006 passed in A.S.No.55 of 2004 by the Sub Court, Sankarankoil, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.314 of 1998 by the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagiri, dated 24.11.2003.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kaliammal
- appellant
S. Gurusamy
- respondent
Petchiammal
- respondent
Thangamalai
- respondent
Thangamalai Nadar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court