Disposed

P.Nesaraj v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC25 Mar 2021CRL OP(MD)/4554/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking police protection was disposed of. The Court directed the second respondent to decide the petitioner's representation on merits within two weeks after affording notice to rival parties.

What did the court decide?

Directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation based on findings and on merits within two weeks after giving notice to rival parties.

P.Nesaraj Vs The Deputy Superintendent… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4554 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 25.03.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4554 of 2021

¶7

P.Nesaraj ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Deputy Superintendant of Police, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner.

¶14

2.Mr.A.Robinson, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, would contend that the representation dated 17.02.2021, submitted by the present petitioner with the second respondent was registered in Current Petition No.383/SDOT/Camp/P1/2021 and posted for enquiry.

¶15

3.Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the second respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 17.02.2021, based on findings and on merits, after giving notice and sufficient opportunity to the rival parties, if any, and the present petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4554 of 2021

¶18

a copy of this order / uploading of the order.

¶19

4.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CRL SIDE)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

rm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

To 1.The Deputy Superintendant of Police, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.F.DEEPAK, Advocate ( SR-13851[F] dated 26/03/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4554 of 2021 25.03.2021 SSS(CO) TR(15.04.2021) 2P 5C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

P.Nesaraj v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Nesaraj v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madhavan Vs The Inspector of Police

P,Manimuthu @ Manikandan Vs The Inspector of Police

R. Kalyanasundaram Vs Sujith Kumar

Jafar Sathick @ Jahabar Sathick Vs The Inspector of Police

Leela.a Vs the Commissioner of Police

Giridharan Vs the Superintendent of Police