The petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel for the hearing of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court, in the absence of representation, disposed of the petition by dismissing it for default via video conferencing link.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.452 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE:09.12.2021
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.452 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.221 and 222 of 2019
Ganesan : Petitioner / Accused
Vs.
3.Paul Raj : 3 rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to call for the records in summon under 41(A) Cr.P.C.,in C.No.04/DC L and O/PTN-TIN-C/2019, dated 02.01.2019 and (2) C.No.01/C1-PS/DC.L&O/2019, dated 05.01.2019 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Palayamkottai Police Station, Tirunelveli/2nd respondent and to quash the same.
For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R.1 and R.2 : M/s.S.Ragaventhiri for R.3
ORDER
When the matter was taken up on 10.11.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption “ for dismissal” on 09.12.2021.
1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.452 of 2019
default. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (Records)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
SSL
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli.
2.The Inspector of Police, Palayamkottai Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.452 of 2019 09.12.2021 NSN(CO) KB(20.12.2021) 2P 4C
2/2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganesan
The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli
The Inspector of Police, Palayamkottai Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District
Paul Raj
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
