The Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition for default under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashment of an FIR due to the petitioner's non-appearance. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.
Criminal Original Petition and connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition dismissed and closed respectively for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.OP(MD)No. 4448 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
CRL.OP(MD)No. 4448 of 2019 and CRL. M.P(MD) No.2714 of 2019
K.Sivasubramanian ... Petitioner/Accused No.1
-vs-
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records in Crime No.132 of 2016 pending on the file of the first respondent and to quash the same in so far as the petitioner/accused No.1 alone is concerned.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.11.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence the matter was directed to be posted under the caption for dismissal on 08.12.2021. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
1/2
CRL.OP(MD)No. 4448 of 2019
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (RECORDS)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ebsi
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
CRL.OP(MD)No. 4448 of 2019 and CRL. M.P(MD) No.2714 of 2019 08.12.2021
USK (20.12.2021) 2P 3C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal original petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the FIR be allowed when it was dismissed for default due to absence of the party.
Whether the connected criminal miscellaneous petition should be closed consequentially.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Sivasubramanian
State
V.Preetha
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
