Dismissed

Rajamani v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Dec 2021CRL OP(MD)/6682/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings. The court observed that the petitioner was reported dead and the case was pending for production of a death certificate, holding that nothing survives for further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition and connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions were dismissed.

Rajamani Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6682 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE:07.12.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶4

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6682 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.4500 and 4501 of 2019

¶5

Rajamani : Petitioner / Accused No.3

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.237/2014) : 1^st Respondent/Complainant 2.Thangaraj Pillai : 2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to C.C.No.18 of 2019, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti, Madurai District and quash the same as illegal for the petitioner is concerned.

¶9

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R.1

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to C.C.No.18 of 2019, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti, Madurai District and quash the same, as far as the petitioner/A.3 is concerned.

¶12

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent would submit that the petitioner/A.3 was reported dead and that the case in C.C.NO.18 of 2019 is posted for production of death certificate of the petitioner/A.3 and therefore, since the petitioner/A.3 had already died, nothing survives for further adjudication or for any direction in this Criminal Original Petition.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/2

¶15

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6682 of 2019

¶16

Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶18

// True Copy //

¶19

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶20

SSL

¶21

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶22

¶23

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6682 of 2019 07.12.2021 RD(16.12.2021) 2P 4C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

Rajamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amsath Begum Vs the Inspector of Police

Gnanasekaran, Vs the Director of General of

K.Muthuirul Vs The Inspector of Police

Lakshmi Narasu Vs the Superintendent of Police

V.Karuppasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

A. Murugesan Vs the Inspector of Police