Disposed

Anwar Raja v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC9 Mar 2021CRL OP(MD)/3058/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner apprehended arrest for offences under IPC 294(b), 406, and 506(ii). Since no FIR is registered but a prior complaint is pending, the court directed the petitioner to appear for enquiry, ordered quick disposal, and allowed a notice system prior to arrest.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear for enquiry; enquiry officer to dispose of complaint within two weeks; petitioner to be notified before arrest/FIR registration.

Anwar Raja Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.3058 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 09/03/2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.3058 of 2021

¶7

Anwar Raja ... Petitioner/Accused (Rank not known) Vs.

¶8

State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Kottampatti Police Station, Kottampatti, Madurai District. Crime No.not known of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶9

S.Ibrahimsha ... Petitioner/Intervener in Crl.MP(MD)No.1842 of 2021 in Crl.OP(MD)No.3058 of 2021

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar,

¶11

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian Advocate.

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.not known of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the intervenor.

¶17

2.The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 406 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.not known of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

3.It appears that the earlier complaint given by the intervenor was closed without assigning any reason. Therefore, a fresh

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

CRL OP(MD). No.3058 of 2021

¶22

complaint has been given and it is still pending for enquiry. No First Information Report has been registered against the petitioner as on date.

¶23

The petitioner is therefore directed to appear for enquiry as and when he is summoned in writing by the investigation officer. If the investigation officer is or opinion that any cognizable offence has been made out and he intends to register any First Information Report, then the petitioner will be put on notice so that the petitioner will have breathing time to move this Court for the relief of anticipatory bail.

¶24

5.The officer who enquiring into the complaint of the intervenor will give a disposal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

6.With these directions, this criminal original petition is

disposed of.

sd/-

09/03/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

¶30

/ /2021

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy,shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶33

¶34

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTAMPATTI POLICE STATION, KOTTAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶35

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶36

+1. CC to Mr.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR, Advocate SR.No.2000

¶37

ORDER IN

¶38

CRL OP(MD) No.3058 of 2021

¶39

Date :09/03/2021

¶40

PMU

¶41

PK/JC/SAR-II/19.03.2021 : 2P/4C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

2/2

Anwar Raja v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Raja v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salmag Enerprises Vs the Addl Commissioner of Customs(Adj)

M/S.Salmag Enterprises Vs the Additional Commissioner of Customs

Subaya Constructions Company Ltd. Vs Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board

M.S.Marketing Vs The State Tax Officer

Tvl.Annamalaiyar Timbers Vs the State Tax Officer(Inspection Cell)

Nallathambi.S Vs the State Tax Officer (St)