informed that they are juniors of the third accused and they wanted a place for setting up an Advocate's Office and they also offered to purchase the building. The de-facto complainant's father told them that he has no intention to sell the property. Then, they told that their senior would complete the sale some how, if he really wants to purchase. Accused 2 and 3 in collusion with the other accused had created a forged sale deed on 26.09.2019. On 10.12.1997, the first accused sold this property to the de-facto complaint for a sum of Rs.1,95,000/-. Subsequently, with an intention to gain money illegally, he had again sold the property to the second accused on 26.09.2019. There are cases pending against the accused 2 and 3 in C.C.Nos.93 of 2007 and 94 of 2007 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli. The third accused is now running an Advocate Office in the first floor and the upper floor. The value of the property is Rs.One crore. With an intention to grab the property, to value the property is shown as Rs.3,00,000/-. A4 and A5 had aided the accused 1 to 3 and they acted as attestors to the document. A6 has prepared the document. A7 helped the other accused in executing this forged document. Therefore, this case came to be registered.
