3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that of course there was some money transaction between the parties to an extent of Rs.4 lakhs and he had already paid Rs. 2 lakhs. He was forced to enter into compromise on 09.10.2020. Challenging the said compromise he filed a suit in O.S.No.3163 of 2020 on the file of the XIII City Civil Court, Chennai seeking declaration that compromise agreement dated 09.10.2020 entered between him and the defacto complainant is null and void and not binding on him. He further draw the attention of this Court to the copy of the agreement dated 20.02.2018, the partnership deeds dated 24.12.2018 and submitted that in none of the documents, the defacto complainant was made signatory. In the complaint to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai dated 08.10.2020, it was alleged that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.43 lakhs on various dates. However in the compromise agreement the amount said to have received was mentioned as Rs.30 lakhs. It Prima facie shows that the defacto complainant's case is false. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 29.06.2021, therefore further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, hence he seeks bail.
