Allowed

Gayathri v. Senthil Kumar

Madras HC16 Dec 2021CRL OP(MD)/18246/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.O.P. under S. 407 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of matrimonial proceedings from Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai to Thuraiyur allowed. Transfer order passed following respondent's non-objection and petitioners' shift in residence due to father's death.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of Cr.M.Ps. No. 5038 of 2015, 4954 of 2017, 3836 of 2018, 5461 of 2018 and 1044 of 2019 in M.C.No.28 of 2012 from Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai to Judicial Magistrate Court, Thuraiy

Gayathri Vs Senthil Kumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.18246 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.18246 of 2019

¶6

1.Gayathri 2.Minor Sajeetha : Petitioners/Petitioners (Represented by the 1st Petitioner Gayathri (Mother)

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Senthil Kumar : Respondent/Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 of Cr.P.C, to transfer the case in Cr.M.P.No.5038 of 2015, Cr.M.P.No.4954 of 2017, Cr.M.P.no.3836 of 2018, Cr.M.P.No.5461 of 2018 and Cr.M.P.No.1044 of 2019 in M.C.No.28 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai to the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thuraiyur.

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Poornachandran For Respondent : Mr.R.Narayanan

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking orders to transfer the petitions in Cr.M.P.No.5038 of 2015, Cr.M.P.No.4954 of 2017, Cr.M.P.No.3836 of 2018, Cr.M.P.No.5461 of 2018 and Cr.M.P.No.1044 of 2019 in M.C.No.28 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai to the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thuraiyur.

¶13

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have only initiated the matrimonial proceedings before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, since the first petitioner's father was at Aruppukottai at that time, that subsequently, he died and hence, the first petitioner along with her minor daughter had moved to Thuraiyur, Trichy District and that therefore, the above proceedings pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai are to be transferred to the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur.

¶14

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, (i.e.,16.12.2021), the learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that the respondent is not having any objections to transfer the above proceedings.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.18246 of 2019

¶18

4.Recording the same, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings, in Cr.M.P.No.5038 of 2015, Cr.M.P.No.4954 of 2017, Cr.M.P.no.3836 of 2018, Cr.M.P.No.5461 of 2018 and Cr.M.P.No.1044 of 2019 in M.C.No.28 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai are ordered to be transferred to the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur.

¶19

5.Considering the nature of the reliefs claimed in the petitions, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur is directed to dispose of the petitions as expeditiously as possible.

¶20

das

¶21

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶22

¶23

The Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur.

¶24

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.18246 of 2019

¶25

USK (30.12.2021) 2P 3C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

Gayathri v. Senthil Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gayathri v. Senthil Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Duraichamy Vs the Inspector of Police

T. Raja, S/O.Thirukannan Vs the Tahsildar Cum Executive

M.Deepalakshmi Vs P.Chandrasekaran

Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Samuel Vs The Inspector of Police