Dismissed

T. Raja, S/O.Thirukannan v. the Tahsildar Cum Executive

Madras HC15 Dec 2021CRL OP(MD)/5257/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash a summons as infructuous after the Government Advocate submitted that the summons had already been issued and the matter required no further adjudication. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

T. Raja, S/O.Thirukannan Vs the Tahsildar Cum Executive — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5257 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 15.12.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5257 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.3308 of 2019

¶7

T.Raja ... Petitioner/ Accused No.1

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.The Tahsildar cum Executive Magistrate,

¶10

Paramakudi,

¶11

Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

2.The Inspector of Police,

¶13

Paramakudi Town Police Station,

¶14

Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents/ Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records in impugned proceedings of the summon in M.C.No.21 of 2019 under Serial No.5 of 2019 dated 18.03.2019 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal insofar as the petitioner.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bharathi

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Crl. side)

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking orders to quash the summon in M.C.No.21 of 2019 dated 18.03.2019 passed by the first respondent.

¶20

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that since summon was issued in M.C.No.21 of 2019 on 18.03.2019, nothing survives for further adjudication.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5257 of 2019

¶24

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

csm

¶29

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶30

¶31

1.The Tahsildar cum Executive Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶32

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5257 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.3308 of 2019 15.12.2021

¶34

RK(27/12/2021) 2P 4C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

T. Raja, S/O.Thirukannan v. the Tahsildar Cum Executive

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T. Raja, S/O.Thirukannan v. the Tahsildar Cum Executive

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharathiraja, Vs P.Prabhu

Venkateshwaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Raja @ Rajagopal, Vs Usha Devi

Nagalakshmi Vs Gopalakirhsnan

Mohan C. Lazarus Vs The Inspector of Police

Mohan C. Lazarus Vs The Inspector of Police