Dismissed

Chandrasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Feb 2021CRL OP(MD)/17610/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings because the petitioners did not appear despite repeated adjournments, resulting in the matter being treated as dropped for non-prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Chandrasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17610 of 2017

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17610 of 2017 and Crl.MP(MD)No.11536 & 11537 of 2017

¶4

1.Chandrasekaran

¶5

2.Ganesan

¶6

3.Aasaithambi

¶7

4.Vishwanathan ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District.

¶10

(in Crime No.156 of 2017) ... 1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶11

2.Mohan ... 1^st Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the C.C.No.181 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Thuraiyiur and quash the same as illegal.

¶13

For Petitioners : No Appearance For R1 : Mr.M.Ganesan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.181 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Thuraiyiur.

¶16

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 06.01.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 29.01.2021, and on that day also, there was no presentation on behalf of the petitioners.

¶17

3.As per the information furnished by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is seen that three witnesses were examined before the Trial Court. T he matter was posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 02.02.2021.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17610 of 2017

¶21

4.Even today ((i.e on 02.02.2021), there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

dss

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyiur

¶29

2.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District.

¶30

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17610 of 2017 and Crl.MP(MD)No.11536 & 11537 of 2017

¶32

02.02.2021

¶33

NA (CO) NR (11/02/2021) 2P : 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Chandrasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrasekaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Gunasekaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajkumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Meenakshi Vs the Inspector of Police

Wilson Thangamuthu Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Kannan Vs The Inspector of Police

P. Mohanram, Vs the Sub Collector Cum