Petitioner sought quashing of a charge sheet. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition on that ground and closed connected petitions.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15882 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Pathmajan
... Petitioner/Accused
Rep by its Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, Madurai City, Crime No.657 of 2015 ... 1st Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the charge sheet in C.C.No.433 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.VI, Madurai,quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R1 : Mr.M.Ganesan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : D.Ramesh Kumar
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.433 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.VI, Madurai.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15882 of 2017
3.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15882 of 2017 and Crl.MP(MD)Nos.10546 & 10547 of 2017 15.02.2021
dss AE/ (01/03/2021) 2P / 4C
2/2
Pathmajan
The State
G. Ilangovan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
