Disposed

John Peter v. The Superintendent of police

Madras HC4 Feb 2021CRL OP(MD)/1430/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal original petition seeking police protection for the petitioner and family. The court directed the second respondent to dispose of the representation on merits within two weeks after notifying the other respondents, without examining merits further, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation dated 11.01.2021 on merits within two weeks after notifying the respondents 3 and 4.

John Peter Vs The Superintendent of police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1430 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.02.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1430 of 2021

John Peter

...Petitioner

/Vs./

1.The Superintendant of Police, Theni District, Theni.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Cumbam North Police Station, Theni District.

¶12

3.Hydhar Ali 4.Rajik ...Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members based on the representation dated 11.01.2021.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Suriyanarayanan.R. For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Erottuchamy Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For Respondents 3 & 4 : Mr.Saburkhan

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members.

¶17

2 . Mr.R.Erottuchamy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that the enquiry on the representation submitted by the petitioner on 11.01.2021 is pending.

¶18

3 . In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 11.01.2021 submitted by the petitioner, based on findings and on merits, after giving notice to the responents 3 and 4, within a period of two weeks from the date https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of receipt of a copy of this order / uploading of the order.

¶19

1/2

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1430 of 2021

¶21

4 . With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

1.The Superintendant of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Inspector of Police, Cumbam North Police Station, Theni District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1430 of 2021 04.02.2021

¶30

KM (22.02.2021) 2P 4C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

John Peter v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

John Peter v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Sankar Vs The Inspector of Police

Jakubar Ali@Jagubar Ali Vs The Inspector of Police

Mohamud Ibrahim@Mohamed Ibrahim Vs The Inspector of Police

A.Murugan Vs The Superintendent of police

Muthuramalingam Vs The Superintendent of police

Jafer Ali Vs The Inspector of Police