Vasu v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges under Sections 406, 420, and 506 IPC for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust. The court viewed the case as largely a money dispute with criminal color.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail in event of arrest upon executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sums, subject to various conditions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16393 of 2020
VASU [PETITIONER/ACCUSED-1]
Vs THE STATE REP BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-10 KOYAMBEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.937/2020.
For Petitioner : M/S K.THENRAJAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who apprehends arrest for alleged offences of cheating and criminal breach of trust in a dispute primarily about money.
Whether the offences constitute a criminal colour appended to a civil dispute regarding a loan and forced sale agreement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VASU
- respondent
THE STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-10 KOYAMBEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court