P.Manikandan v. State Rep by Its
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed an anticipatory bail petition wherein the petitioner had been in judicial custody, deeming the application infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.8401 of 2021
P.Manikandan .. Petitioner
Vs.
State represented by
Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District.
(Crime No.1 of 2021) .. Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of
Criminal Procedure Code praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
the event of his arrest in Crime No.1 of 2021 pending investigation
on the file of the Respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vengatesan
For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran
G.A.(Crl.Side)
- - - - -
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 450, 417, 376(2)(k), 313 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.1 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
- This is the second anticipatory bail application. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner was already arrested on 09.06.2021 and remanded to Judicial Custody.
- In view of the above submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is dismissed as infractuous.
-sd/14/06/2021
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Manikandan
- respondent
State represented by Inspector of Police
Coram
V.BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court