Allowed

Nazeer Ahmed v. State Rep. by

Madras HC2 Jun 2021CRL OP/8364/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing arrest under Sections 406 and 506 IPC in a property dispute deemed essentially civil. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including execution of a bond, reporting as required, and non-tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail was granted in the event of arrest, subject to conditions including execution of a bond, reporting to police, and non-tampering with evidence.

Nazeer Ahmed Vs State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 02.06.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.8364 of 2021

¶6

1.Nazeer Ahmed

¶7

2.Ayoob Khan

¶8

3.Aslom Anwar Shaik ... Petitioners

¶9

State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Ambur Police Station, Ambur, Thirupathur – 635802.

¶10

Vs.
... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in Crime Not known pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Padmanabhan

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran

¶14

Government Advocate (Crl. Side) **** O R D E R

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

The petitioners, who apprehends arrest pursuant to the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant under Sections 406 & 506(i) IPC, seek Anticipatory Bail.

¶17

2.It is seen that the petitioners are related to the defacto complainant and the dispute with reference to a property in which, the petitioners are also entitled to a share. The dispute in essence appears to be a civil dispute. I am of the considered opinion that the petitioners should be granted Anticipatory Bail subject to certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of resumption of regular court hearings at Ambur, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, subject to the following conditions:

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

(a) the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed;

¶20

(b) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶21

(c)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶22

(d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶23

(e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶24

(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerela [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

¶25

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶26

With the above directions, anticipatory bail is granted and this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶27

-sd/-

¶28

02/06/2021

¶29

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶30

TRUE COPY

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AMBUR. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBUR POLICE STATION, AMBUR, THIRUPATHUR - 635 802. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. CC to M/S.D.PADMANABHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8364/2021 Date :02/06/2021 MK:08/07/2021

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nazeer Ahmed v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazeer Ahmed v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rajagopal Vs R.Suman

K.Mohamed Nayeem Vs Ismail Musa Wakf

B.Gowdappa Vs Jayamma

V.Govindhan Vs State Rep.by

Rajasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajasekar Vs State Rep. by