Allowed

Rajasekar v. State Rep. by

Madras HC2 Jun 2021CRL OP/8375/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras allowed a Criminal Original Petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, accused in a liquor contravention case, was granted bail subject to executing a bond with sureties and complying with specific conditions regarding reporting, tampering with evidence, and absconding.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail with conditions to execute bond with sureties within 15 days and comply with reporting and non-tampering obligations.

Rajasekar Vs State Rep. by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.06.2021

¶3

CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC E R.SUBRAMANIAN Crl.O.P.No.8375 of 2021

¶4

Rajasekar ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Ammapet Town Police Station, Salem City, Salem District. (Crime No.168 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.168 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Revathi For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

¶6

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.168 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶7

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest pursuant to the First Information Report registered against him in Crime No.168 of 2021 under Sections 4(1)(a), 4(1-A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶8

The petitioner is the 2^nd accused. The case of the prosecution is that the 1^st accused who was in possession of 25 bottles of Brandy each containing 180 ml had disclosed that the petitioner had engaged him to sell the Brandy in black-market.

¶9

Considering the quantum of the liquor seized, I am of the opinion that the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, within 15 days from the date of resumption of regular hearings in the said Court, subject to the following conditions:

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

[a] The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed;

¶12

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶13

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

¶14

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶15

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶16

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

¶17

[g] if the accused persons thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶18

Considering the present situation, the petitioner is granted 15 days time to execute the bond and furnish sureties from the date of commencement of regular functioning of the court below. In the event of violation of any of the conditions, the anticipatory bail granted will stand automatically cancelled.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

02/06/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, SALEM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAPET TOWN POLICE STATION, SALEM CITY, SALEM DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. CC to M/S.R.NALLIYAPPAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.8375/2021 Date :02/06/2021 MK:12/07/2021

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajasekar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajasekar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rajagopal Vs R.Suman

K.Mohamed Nayeem Vs Ismail Musa Wakf

B.Gowdappa Vs Jayamma

V.Govindhan Vs State Rep.by

Rajasekaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Govinthan Vs the State Rep.by