T.Sekar v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dealt with a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court directed the respondent police to conduct the pending enquiry and either register an FIR or close the petition enquiry within two weeks, reporting back to the court on the specified date.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondent police to conduct inquiry within two weeks and report if prima facie case exists or close inquiry.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Second day of April Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7369 of 2021
T.SEKAR [PETITIONER / ACCUSED]
Vs
STATE REP BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, S.P OFFICE CAMPUS, SATHUVACHARI, VELLORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021
For Petitioner : V.C.ARUN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.T.SHANMUGA RAJESWARAN, Government Advocate (crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Section 420 IPC.
Whether to direct the respondent police to conduct the pending enquiry within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.SEKAR
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, S.P OFFICE CAMPUS, SATHUVACHARI, VELLORE DISTRICT.
Coram
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court