Deepa v. M.Deivanai
Case brief
What is this about?
Three petitioners filed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash a criminal complaint. The high court found the main criminal case had already been disposed of, rendering the petition infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Crl.O.P.No.7355 of 2016 and
M.P Nos.3860 and 3861 of 2016
- 1.Deepa W/o.Chinnamuniappan
2.Shalini W/o.Kumar 3.Anjali W/o.Senthil ...Petitioners
Vs
M.Deivanai ...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in M.C.No.8 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court II, Krishnagiri and quash the same in respect of this petitioners.
When the matter is taken up today for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the main case in in M.C.No.8 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court II, Krishnagiri, has been disposed of on 10.10.2017. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepa W/o. Chinnamuniappan
- petitioner
Shalini W/o. Kumar
- petitioner
Anjali W/o. Senthil
- respondent
M. Deivanai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court