Disposed

T.Bharath Thirumooorthy v. State by

Madras HC20 Apr 2021CRL OP/19865/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The Special Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation was complete and a final report filed. The court directed the petitioner to execute a bond under Section 88 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to appear before the Special Court, Coimbatore and execute a bond under Section 88 Cr.P.C. within one week.

T.Bharath Thirumooorthy Vs State by — Corruption | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19865 of 2020

¶7

T.BHARATH THIRUMOOORTHY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶8

¶9

STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI/ACB/CHENNAI. CRIME NO.RC032/2020

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.B.KUMARASAMY Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR.K.SRINIVASAN, Special Public Prosecutor for

¶12

CBI-cases

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 120-B r/w420 of IPC and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in Crime No.RC032/2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Srinivasan, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases .

¶17

Today (20/04/2021), when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Srinivasan learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases submitted that in the present case, investigation was over and final report has been filed and the same was taken cognizance by the Special Court for CBI Cases, Coimbatore viz., II Additional District Judge, Coimbatore. He further submitted that since final report has been filed, the petitioner may be directed to appear before the Special Court for CBI cases, Coimbatore viz., II Additional District Judge, Coimbatore and execute a Bond under Section 88 of Cr.P.C with an undertaking that he will appear before the Special Court for CBI Cases, Coimbatore regularly on all hearing.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Recording the said submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases, the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Special Court for CBI Cases, Coimbatore viz., II Additional Judge,, Coimbatore and execute a bond under Section 88 of the Cr.P.C within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition is closed accordingly.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

20/04/2021

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶26

¶27

1 THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

¶28

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI/ACB/CHENNAI.

¶29

3 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR CBI CASES, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶30

+1 CC to M/S.B.KUMARASAMY Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.5144

CRL OP.19865/2020

Date :20/04/2021

TA-04/05/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Bharath Thirumooorthy v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Bharath Thirumooorthy v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendran Vs Divya @ Selvanayagi

K.Natanam Vs K.Niveditha

Seeliya Vs the Inspector of Police

E.Sethu Madhavan Vs the State Rep by Its

Deepa Vs M.Deivanai

G.Maheswaru @ Banu Vs v.Gnanasekaran