Allowed

R.Vinoth @ Vinothkumar v. State Rep. by

Madras HC8 Mar 2021CRL OP/7173/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed a bail application wherein the petitioner, hailing from a previous interim bail and completed investigation, was ordered to be granted absolute bail with sureties, conditionally reporting, and restrictions on tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is to be released on bail on execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, subject to standard conditions.

R.Vinoth @ Vinothkumar Vs State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 08.03.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.7173 of 2020

¶6

R.Vinoth @ Vinothkumar ... Petitioner Vs. State by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, W-6 All Women Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.2 of 2020) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.2 of 2020 on the file of Respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Hasain For Respondent : Mrs.M.Prabhavathi, Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶7

The petitioner is a sole accused. The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.02.2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 354(C), 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Sec.4 of T.N. Women Harassment Act in Crime No.2 of 2020 on the file of respondent police, seeks bail.

¶8

Earlier, the petitioner was arrested on 25.02.2020 and subsequently, he was granted interim bail by this court on 01.04.2020. Thereafter, this petition has been listed for further hearing.

¶9

I have head and considered rival submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has taken a videograph of defacto complainant while taking bath. Hence, a criminal case has been registered against the petitioner and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.02.2020.

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has strongly opposed this petition on the ground that the investigation has been completed and the mobile phone has also been recovered.

¶13

Taking into consideration of the fact that, the petitioner was granted interim bail dated 01.04.2020 by this court, now the investigation is also completed, there is no previous antecedents against the petitioner, the interim bail granted to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the following conditions:

¶14

(a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai and on further conditions that:

¶15

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶16

¶17

when required for interrogation ;

¶18

(d) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar

¶19

nature;

¶20

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶21

(f) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶22

(g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶23

(h) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶26

-sd/08/03/2021

¶27

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶28

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT,
EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON,
PUZHAL, CHENNAI.
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
W-6, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
CC to M/S.M.MOHAMED HASAIN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.7173/2020
Date :08/03/2021
EP-09/03/2021

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Vinoth @ Vinothkumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vinoth @ Vinothkumar v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vadivel Vs State by

Kannan Vs State Rep by

V.Ganesan Vs State Rep by

Pradeep Vs State Rep by

Devan @ Devaraj Vs State Rep by

Latha Vs State Rep.by