5.This Court on considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the materials, it is seen that in this case, one Senthil, who is running M/s.Mani medicals was examined as PW4 and the copy of the medicine bill No.5263 was marked as MO1. During trial, PW4 was cross examined in length as well as other witnesses. The documents sought to be produced would no way improve the case of the petitioner/accused. In this case, admittedly, the two children aged about 4 and 6 years died in unnatural and poisonous substances were found in the viscera report of the children. While being so, summoning of Sales Register, Cash Register/Cash Book, Stock Register/Stock Book, Purchase Register, Schedule Register and GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B of the Sales Tax Returns would no further the case of the petitioner. Now the case is at the penultimate stage for examination of the Investigating Officer. Further, the trial Court in a detailed order, had given a well reasoned finding and the same need not be interfered with. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to set aside the order dated 03.03.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.839 of 2020 in S.C(K).No.77 of 2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpet and same is hereby affirmed.
