Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition filed against police authorities. Court granted permission for withdrawal, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.04.2021
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P.No.9429 of 2021
Thilagar @ Venkat ...Petitioner Versus
Chennai – 600 004.
P-6, Kodungaiyur Police Station,
Chennai. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus direction, to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the representation of the petitioner dated 23.03.2021 stipulated time may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthilkumar
For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing through video conference, today, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and this Court has granted permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
klt
To
PL(CO) KKV/01/06/2021
Thilagar @ Venkat
Director General of Police
Commissioner of Police
Inspector of Police
M. Nirmal Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
