Allowed

Sekar @ Rajasekar v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC17 Mar 2021CRL OP/5333/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to petitioners charged with illegal sand transportation. The court imposed conditions including a non-refundable deposit, sureties, regular reporting, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs.5,000 to Kaakkum Karangal, furnishing surety bonds, daily reporting for two weeks, and other standard conditions.

Sekar @ Rajasekar Vs the State Rep.by — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.03.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.5333 of 2021

¶6

Sekar @ Rajasekar 2. Ravichandran ... Petitioners -VsThe State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvarur District. (Crime No.1302 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.1302 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of respondent police.

¶7

For Petitioners: Mr.M.Jaikumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶8

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶9

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, r/w. 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 in Crime No.1302 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶10

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners had illegally transported one unit of Clay Sand by using Tractor bearing Registration No.TN 50 Z-5127, without any valid permission. Hence, the complaint.

¶11

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. On instruction, he would further submit that the petitioners are prepared to deposit some considerable amount to any charitable organization or association without prejudice to their contention and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners had illegally transported one unit of Clay Sand by using Tractor bearing Registration No.TN 50 Z-5127, without any valid permission. He would submit that the respondent police have seized the said vehicle along with one unit of Clay Sand. He further submitted that there is no previous case pending as against these petitioners.

¶14

It is seen that there is no previous case pending as against these petitioners and in order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) as non refundable deposit to “Kaakkum Karangal, ICICI, Santhome High Road, Santhome Branch, Chennai– 28, ICICI Bank, A/C.No: 000101219273, IFSC Code: ICIC0003432” without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

¶15

Merely, because the petitioners has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶16

Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶17

(a) the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/(Rupees Five Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of “Kaakkum Karangal, ICICI, Santhome High Road, Santhome Branch, Chennai – 28, ICICI Bank, A/C.No:000101219273, IFSC Code:ICIC0003432” and on such payment and production of proof of deposit of the above amount, they shall be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed automatically and on further condition that:

¶18

[b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶19

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the interrogation.

¶20

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶21

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ investigation or trial.

¶22

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶23

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶24

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶25

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶26

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVARUR. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVARUR [FOR INFORMATION]. 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVARUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

¶28

5 KAAKKUM KARANGAL, ICICI, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, SANTHOME BRANCH, CHENNAI – 28, ICICI BANK, A/C.NO: 000101219273, IFSC CODE: ICIC0003432

¶29

+1 CC to M/S.M.JAIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO. 3699

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MN-24/03/2021

Sekar @ Rajasekar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sekar @ Rajasekar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prathap Vs State Rep.by

Sathiyanathan Vs State Rep.by

Karthick Vs the State Rep.by

K.Santhiya Vs State Rep.by

Manikandan Vs State by

Raja @ Aasirvatham Vs State Rep by