Disposed

Raja @ Aasirvatham v. State Rep by

Madras HC17 Mar 2021CRL OP/20840/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail directions requiring the police to complete their enquiry within four weeks. If a prima facie case is found, they must register an FIR; otherwise, close the case. The petitioner was directed not to be arrested pending this. The petition was subsequently closed.

What did the court decide?

Directions to complete enquiry within four weeks and halt arrest. Case closed.

Raja @ Aasirvatham Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Seventeenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20840 of 2020

¶6

RAJA @ AASIRVATHAM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶7

¶8

STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2020

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.E.THAMIZHANNAI Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420 r/w Section 109 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No. not known on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶15

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry in Current Paper No.P2/31042/3148/2020 is pending against the petitioner.

¶16

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent Police is directed to complete the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall register the First Information Report or close the petition enquiry. Till then, the respondent police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed.

¶19

-sd/-
17/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,
VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.E.THAMIZHANNAI Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.20840/2020
Date :17/03/2021
cs 16/04/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raja @ Aasirvatham v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja @ Aasirvatham v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prathap Vs State Rep.by

Sathiyanathan Vs State Rep.by

Karthick Vs the State Rep.by

K.Santhiya Vs State Rep.by

Manikandan Vs State by

Palanimalai Vs State Rep.by